Learn about the 10 biggest problems with public schools today, both from the perspective of the administrators and the teachers Few would argue that the state of our education system has plenty of room for improvement.
More than four-in-ten say that liberals who are not religious have too much control over the Democratic Party, while an almost identical percentage says that religious conservatives have too much influence over the Republican Party.
The public also has distinctly different perceptions of both parties when it comes to dealing with religion and personal freedoms. However, independents are more critical of the influence of religious conservatives on the Republican Party than they are of the influence of secular liberals on the Democratic Party.
Even many who are politically liberal and who believe in evolution favor expanding the scope of public school education to include teaching creationism. The survey shows that large majorities of Americans believe that parents, scientists and school boards all should have a say in how evolution is taught in schools.
However, a growing minority feels President Bush mentions his faith and prayer too much. This change in the image of the Democratic Party has occurred across the political spectrum, but it is particularly noteworthy among independents.
In general, people who are the most religious themselves are the most critical of the Democratic Party in this regard. Fewer Republicans believe this than do Democrats and independents, but young people and women more often credit the Democrats for protecting personal freedoms than do older people and men.
Religious Conservatives, Secular Liberals Seen as Having Too Much Clout Both the Democratic and Republican Parties receive considerable criticism for being too beholden to ideological constituencies within the parties.
Not surprisingly, Republicans are particularly critical of the Democratic Party in this respect, and Democrats are equally critical of Republicans. But there is substantial concern coming from within the parties as well.
Centrist members of both parties more often express these concerns about their own party than do their more ideological counterparts. In fact, independents are nearly as critical of the Republican Party in this respect as are Democrats overall.
Not surprisingly, white evangelical Protestants and conservative Republicans are the most uniformly critical of liberal efforts on these types of issues. But many Democrats share this view, particularly moderate and conservative Democrats.
Beyond these political divides, there are also significant educational and regional differences in how liberals are perceived. Residents of the Northeast and West are less prone to take this view. Interestingly, three-quarters of African Americans also see liberals pushing too far in keeping religion out of schools and government.
It is important to note, however, that this negative perception of non-religious liberals is not linked to views of the Democratic Party among blacks. There also are sizable differences across religious and ethnic lines.
Divided Over Evolution Most Americans believe that God was responsible for the creation of life on earth but divide on the question of whether and how life has changed since the creation. Despite this broad agreement regarding the origins of life, the public is deeply divided on precisely how life developed.
But both mainline Protestants and Catholics are divided over the nature of the evolutionary process. These differences of opinion carry over into politics as well see detailed tables on pp. Age, gender and education are also strongly related to views about the development of living things.
Many Think Scientists Disagree about Evolution There is no public consensus about how scientists view evolution. While most people who accept evolution believe there is a scientific consensus on the topic, they themselves express less certainty about how life developed on earth than do people who believe the creationist account.
Evolution in the Schools Even though nearly half of Americans believe that humans evolved over time, this poll and many others have shown that substantial majorities of the public favor adding creationism to the public school curriculum. But significantly fewer people say creationism should supplant evolution in the curriculum: Support for teaching creationism along with evolution is quite broad-based, with majority support even among seculars, liberal Democrats and those who accept natural selection theory.
At the same time, not all creationists believe that creationism should replace evolution in the schools: These findings strongly suggest that much of the public believes it is desirable to offer more viewpoints where controversial subjects in the schools are concerned.
White evangelicals and black Protestants are the only religious groups expressing majority support for teaching creationism instead of evolution in public schools.
Majorities of mainline Protestants, Catholics and seculars oppose this idea. Large majorities of Americans believe that parents, scientists and science teachers and school boards should all have a say in how evolution is taught in public schools, and these majorities are found among all religious groups and people on both sides of the question of how life developed on earth.
But there are deep divisions in the public about who should have the primary say on how evolution is handled. Lukewarm Ratings for the Schools in Dealing with Sensitive Topics Americans give public schools mediocre ratings for their handling of controversial subjects.
White evangelicals give public schools lower marks for their handling of religion than do white mainline Protestants and white Catholics. In addition, both African Americans and Hispanics are highly critical of school performance in this regard.
Those who reject the idea of evolution are also more likely than others to give the schools low marks for their handling of religion.
On both sex education and homosexuality, non-whites are considerably more likely to give schools a poor rating than are whites. Despite the controversial nature of these subjects, very few parents say that their children have been made uncomfortable when these topics come up at school.
These results are consistently low across religious and political groups and geographic regions. Continuing Ambivalence As in the past, the public is divided over whether religious organizations should speak out politically.An argumentative essay requires you to decide on a topic and take a position on it.
You'll need to back up your viewpoint with well-researched facts and information as well. One of the hardest parts is deciding which topic to write about, but there are plenty of ideas available to get you started. Violent protests and clashes with guest speakers grab headlines, but many free speech advocates are more concerned about subtler speech issues.
School prayer, in the context of religious liberty, is state-sanctioned or mandatory prayer by students in public r-bridal.coming on the country and the type of school, state-sponsored prayer may be required, permitted, or prohibited. Countries that prohibit school-sponsored prayer United States.
III. SCHOOL DISTRICT ORGANIZATION AND STATE AID.
The Free Common School r-bridal.com yearly after , the Regents and the Governor urged the Legislature to establish and endow a system of common schools. No Prayer in the Public Schools Essay Words | 13 Pages.
Over the past three decades, the issue of the role of prayer in the public school system has become increasingly controversial. - Prayer Should Be Allowed in Public Schools School prayer is a very controversial issue in today’s society. The issue of school prayer is about whether the public school systems should let the students pray, at the start of the school day, as a class.